Latex Maths

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Distributive architecture for inference engine (deduction)

Eureka!! This new architecture is much simpler:



Each agent responds to queries and spits out solutions. For example, if you believe that "professors who wear sandals are nice to students" then you listen to queries about "who is nice to students". When there is a hit, you either:
  1. return an answer, if you know as a fact that XYZ is nice to students. 
  2. return a sub-goal, in this case, "does XYZ wear sandals?" and wait for others to answer. 
In case #2, if you got an answer "Professor Matt Mahoney wears sandals", say with TV = 0.9, then you decide how to calculate the TV of the conclusion given that TV of premise = 0.9. The only calculation you need to perform is for the rule that you own. Then you return the answer to the asker.

This architecture is so wonderful because there is no need to construct the proof tree anymore. The proof tree seems to have disappeared but it is really implicitly constructed within the network of agents!

Thanks to Matt Mahoney for proposing the CMR (competitive message routing) architecture.

For reference, this is an older design that reveals my thinking:  (This can be seen as a single agent, building the proof tree internally while trying to answer 1 query.  In the new architecture each agent is responsible for applying only one rule at a time).

No comments:

Post a Comment